Category: News & Events
In a significant victory for community advocates and nonprofit organizations across Manatee County, Commissioner Amanda Ballard withdrew her proposal that would have required nonprofits receiving county funding to verify they are not serving undocumented immigrants.
The controversial measure, which was pulled from Tuesday's agenda after lengthy discussion and widespread public opposition, would have affected 86 organizations receiving more than $26 million annually from Manatee County Government. These funds support vital programs including early childhood development, college readiness, shelters, dental care, sexual assault advocacy, and addiction recovery services.
Ballard had argued that taxpayer funds should not support services for people living in the country without legal authorization, citing federal restrictions on certain public benefits for undocumented individuals. However, she acknowledged having "no idea how much, if any, of the county's support helps people living in the country without proper authorization."
During a tense public comment session, eighteen people—most of them nonprofit leaders—lined up to speak against the proposal. Only one person expressed support.
Katie Becker, executive director of Parenting Matters, which provides parenting education and support to families in Sarasota and Manatee counties, questioned the necessity of the measure. "I would like to respectfully ask, do we really need to do this?" she said, noting her organization provides services in multiple settings including libraries, making it nearly impossible to prescreen families for their legal status. Becker warned that Parenting Matters risked losing $90,000 in funding if the measure passed.
Kelly Kirshner, chair of UnidosNow, warned commissioners about the type of overreach the proposed policy could lead to, saying it would create a "patchwork" system of enforcement. "(The policy) attempts to deputize nonprofits—organizations providing child care, tutoring and college prep, addiction recovery, domestic violence services, among many others—into acting now as immigration screeners without legal standards, without training and without protection," Kirshner said. "That is not compliance, that is liability you are now shifting onto your local nonprofits."
Kathleen Cramer, executive director of Turning Points, which assists people at risk of or experiencing homelessness, said needing to check citizenship status of every person before offering help would be time-consuming for her staff. "So if you're going to have us have to look into their status and verify status for 10,000 people, the burden will be overwhelming," Cramer said. "It will slow down the process for everyone, and so we will not be able to serve as many clients as we would, because we're going to have our staff looking into ensuring people's status."
Commissioner Jason Bearden was the only other commissioner to voice support for the measure, saying the county has a right to know how much taxpayer money is "spent on illegal aliens." However, other commissioners made clear the proposal would not have the votes to pass.
"If the nonprofits are violating federal or state law, it's not our job to oversee it," said Commissioner George Kruse. "Why are we inserting ourselves? Why are we all of a sudden the police on federal or state policy?"
Commissioner Tal Siddique added, "I would rather not see this come back. I just don't think that there's a real, meaningful solution here to be had unless there's change at the federal level or case law, because there's a very narrow slice of what we could accomplish."
After hearing from nonprofit leaders and community members, Ballard thanked all stakeholders for voicing their concerns and said she would withdraw the item until she could have more conversations with local nonprofits. She is scheduled to meet with nonprofit leaders Friday to discuss their concerns about the proposal.
"I want to do this in a way, if it does move forward, that I'm not putting people in a situation where they feel scared or uncomfortable," Ballard said. "I want to work collaboratively with nonprofits and figure out a way that this can be done, so that it's not an immense burden, and that we can use taxpayer dollars responsibly and be fiscally responsible without making nonprofits feel that they can't complete their core mission."
While the proposal has been withdrawn for now, the discussion highlights ongoing tensions between government oversight and nonprofit operations in Manatee County. Nonprofit leaders expressed relief at the outcome but remain vigilant as conversations continue.
Relevance to Point Pleasant Neighborhood
This decision directly impacts the Point Pleasant community in several important ways:
Community Organizations: Many nonprofits serving Point Pleasant residents receive county funding for programs like after-school activities, senior services, food assistance, and community events. These organizations would have faced increased administrative burdens and potential funding losses.
Advocacy Success: The withdrawal of this proposal demonstrates the power of community voice in local government. When nonprofit leaders and residents spoke out collectively, commissioners listened—a valuable lesson for neighborhood advocacy efforts.
Service Accessibility: Point Pleasant residents who rely on nonprofit services for childcare, educational support, healthcare access, or emergency assistance could have faced delays or denials if organizations had to screen for immigration status before providing help.
Precedent Setting: Had this policy passed, it could have opened the door to similar requirements for other community programs, potentially affecting how neighborhood associations and local groups operate.
Resource Allocation: Nonprofits facing increased administrative costs would have had fewer resources available for direct services to Point Pleasant residents, potentially reducing program quality or availability.
The outcome shows that when community stakeholders unite around shared concerns, they can influence county policy decisions that affect neighborhood wellbeing and the organizations that serve our community.
Sources: Bradenton Herald; The Bradenton Times